Category talk:Liberation Domain - Revision history

Cure at 18:15, 15 March 2010

2010-03-15T18:15:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:15, 15 March 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Deities would go in the discussion section I think. So not them. Rather for spells. That could eventually include D&D spells, but for the immediate term it would be for spells unique to Ravenloft and//or for spell lists unique to Ravenloft. The [[Weave Domain]] is probably the best example for the moment, although it is not complete.[[User:Cure\|Cure]] 08:13, 14 March 2010 (UTC)		Deities would go in the discussion section I think. So not them. Rather for spells. That could eventually include D&D spells, but for the immediate term it would be for spells unique to Ravenloft and//or for spell lists unique to Ravenloft. The [[Weave Domain]] is probably the best example for the moment, although it is not complete.[[User:Cure\|Cure]] 08:13, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

			On further consideration the use of categories here may get revised. I want to work on it a little more before deciding.[[User:Cure\|Cure]] 18:15, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Cure at 08:13, 14 March 2010

2010-03-14T08:13:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:13, 14 March 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Re: Domains as categories... are you planning to put the spells of the domain in the category? Or deities who grant the domain? In short, why category and not page? I don't think we need pages for standard d&d spells, do we? -- [[User:Gonzoron\|Gonzoron]] 02:47, 14 March 2010 (UTC)		Re: Domains as categories... are you planning to put the spells of the domain in the category? Or deities who grant the domain? In short, why category and not page? I don't think we need pages for standard d&d spells, do we? -- [[User:Gonzoron\|Gonzoron]] 02:47, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

			Deities would go in the discussion section I think. So not them. Rather for spells. That could eventually include D&D spells, but for the immediate term it would be for spells unique to Ravenloft and//or for spell lists unique to Ravenloft. The [[Weave Domain]] is probably the best example for the moment, although it is not complete.[[User:Cure\|Cure]] 08:13, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Gonzoron: Created page with 'Re: Domains as categories... are you planning to put the spells of the domain in the category? Or deities who grant the domain? In short, why category and not page? I don't th…'

2010-03-14T02:47:54Z

Created page with 'Re: Domains as categories... are you planning to put the spells of the domain in the category? Or deities who grant the domain? In short, why category and not page? I don't th…'

New page

Re: Domains as categories... are you planning to put the spells of the domain in the category? Or deities who grant the domain? In short, why category and not page? I don't think we need pages for standard d&d spells, do we? -- [[User:Gonzoron|Gonzoron]] 02:47, 14 March 2010 (UTC)