Category talk:Religion - Revision history

Gonzoron at 19:50, 17 March 2010

2010-03-17T19:50:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:50, 17 March 2010
Line 7:		Line 7:
	Not sure what you mean by "redundant entries." Do you mean that each religion should be only a religion and not a society? I think it's fine to leave both tags. Don't worry too much about the next catalogue import. Things have evolved so much since I wrote the script that it will be a major overhaul to make things work anyway, so do what's right for the wiki and I'll work out the importing later.		Not sure what you mean by "redundant entries." Do you mean that each religion should be only a religion and not a society? I think it's fine to leave both tags. Don't worry too much about the next catalogue import. Things have evolved so much since I wrote the script that it will be a major overhaul to make things work anyway, so do what's right for the wiki and I'll work out the importing later.

	The batch page-to-~~catalog~~ conversion is not as automatic as I make it sound. There's a lot of manual effort to do it. The more pages done at once, the more economy of scale makes it easy. For 11 pages, I think it's easier just to do them individually via wiki interface. -- [[User:Gonzoron\|Gonzoron]] 19:50, 17 March 2010 (UTC)		The batch page-to-category conversion is not as automatic as I make it sound. There's a lot of manual effort to do it. The more pages done at once, the more economy of scale makes it easy. For 11 pages, I think it's easier just to do them individually via wiki interface. -- [[User:Gonzoron\|Gonzoron]] 19:50, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Gonzoron at 19:50, 17 March 2010

2010-03-17T19:50:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:50, 17 March 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Could the remaining religions that are not categories be converted to categories as a batch operation?[[User:Cure\|Cure]] 16:23, 17 March 2010 (UTC)		Could the remaining religions that are not categories be converted to categories as a batch operation?[[User:Cure\|Cure]] 16:23, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

			Not sure what you mean by "redundant entries." Do you mean that each religion should be only a religion and not a society? I think it's fine to leave both tags. Don't worry too much about the next catalogue import. Things have evolved so much since I wrote the script that it will be a major overhaul to make things work anyway, so do what's right for the wiki and I'll work out the importing later.

			The batch page-to-catalog conversion is not as automatic as I make it sound. There's a lot of manual effort to do it. The more pages done at once, the more economy of scale makes it easy. For 11 pages, I think it's easier just to do them individually via wiki interface. -- [[User:Gonzoron\|Gonzoron]] 19:50, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Cure at 16:23, 17 March 2010

2010-03-17T16:23:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:23, 17 March 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	So I've made this a subcategory of Society, but removing the redundant entries in all the religions would intrude on the Catalogue entry. Hopefully it will get fixed at the next go round?		So I've made this a subcategory of Society, but removing the redundant entries in all the religions would intrude on the Catalogue entry. Hopefully it will get fixed at the next go round?

			---

			Could the remaining religions that are not categories be converted to categories as a batch operation?[[User:Cure\|Cure]] 16:23, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

DeepShadow: Created page with 'So I've made this a subcategory of Society, but removing the redundant entries in all the religions would intrude on the Catalogue entry. Hopefully it will get fixed at the next…'

2010-01-29T02:52:25Z

Created page with 'So I've made this a subcategory of Society, but removing the redundant entries in all the religions would intrude on the Catalogue entry. Hopefully it will get fixed at the next…'

New page

So I've made this a subcategory of Society, but removing the redundant entries in all the religions would intrude on the Catalogue entry. Hopefully it will get fixed at the next go round?