Category talk:The Twisting - Revision history

Gonzoron at 15:12, 24 May 2010

2010-05-24T15:12:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:12, 24 May 2010
Line 5:		Line 5:
	Take a look at [[Demonology]]. I suspect that it does not respect rules of containment and I believe that it is perfectly good as it currently exists. Or am I missing something? And if it is fine, shouldn't [[Freak]] be within the [[:Category:The Twisting]]? Insight sought . . .[[User:Cure\|Cure]] 15:35, 27 April 2010 (UTC)		Take a look at [[Demonology]]. I suspect that it does not respect rules of containment and I believe that it is perfectly good as it currently exists. Or am I missing something? And if it is fine, shouldn't [[Freak]] be within the [[:Category:The Twisting]]? Insight sought . . .[[User:Cure\|Cure]] 15:35, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

	Let's take the categorization questions to a central place to work them out: [[~~Mistepedia_Talk~~:Categorization_Guidelines]] -- [[User:Gonzoron\|Gonzoron]] 14:59, 24 May 2010 (UTC)		Let's take the categorization questions to a central place to work them out: [[Mistipedia_Talk:Categorization_Guidelines]] -- [[User:Gonzoron\|Gonzoron]] 14:59, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

2010-05-24T14:59:45Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:59, 24 May 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Take a look at [[Demonology]]. I suspect that it does not respect rules of containment and I believe that it is perfectly good as it currently exists. Or am I missing something? And if it is fine, shouldn't [[Freak]] be within the [[:Category:The Twisting]]? Insight sought . . .[[User:Cure\|Cure]] 15:35, 27 April 2010 (UTC)		Take a look at [[Demonology]]. I suspect that it does not respect rules of containment and I believe that it is perfectly good as it currently exists. Or am I missing something? And if it is fine, shouldn't [[Freak]] be within the [[:Category:The Twisting]]? Insight sought . . .[[User:Cure\|Cure]] 15:35, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

			Let's take the categorization questions to a central place to work them out: [[Mistepedia_Talk:Categorization_Guidelines]] -- [[User:Gonzoron\|Gonzoron]] 14:59, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

2010-04-27T15:35:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:35, 27 April 2010
Line 3:		Line 3:
	There was when [[Freak]] was included within it. But Deepshadow observed that that broke containment rules, which I am struggling to come to terms with, although I did move Freaks out of the category.		There was when [[Freak]] was included within it. But Deepshadow observed that that broke containment rules, which I am struggling to come to terms with, although I did move Freaks out of the category.

	Take a look at [[Demonology]]. I suspect that it does not respect rules of containment and I believe that it is perfectly good as it currently exists. Or am I missing something? And if it is fine, shouldn't [[Freak]] be within the [[:Category:Twisting]]? Insight sought . . .[[User:Cure\|Cure]] 15:34, 27 April 2010 (UTC)		Take a look at [[Demonology]]. I suspect that it does not respect rules of containment and I believe that it is perfectly good as it currently exists. Or am I missing something? And if it is fine, shouldn't [[Freak]] be within the [[:Category:The Twisting]]? Insight sought . . .[[User:Cure\|Cure]] 15:35, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

2010-04-27T15:34:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:34, 27 April 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Is there a good reason for this to be a category and not a page? -- [[User:Gonzoron\|Gonzoron]] 18:31, 26 April 2010 (UTC)		Is there a good reason for this to be a category and not a page? -- [[User:Gonzoron\|Gonzoron]] 18:31, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

			There was when [[Freak]] was included within it. But Deepshadow observed that that broke containment rules, which I am struggling to come to terms with, although I did move Freaks out of the category.

			Take a look at [[Demonology]]. I suspect that it does not respect rules of containment and I believe that it is perfectly good as it currently exists. Or am I missing something? And if it is fine, shouldn't [[Freak]] be within the [[:Category:Twisting]]? Insight sought . . .[[User:Cure\|Cure]] 15:34, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

2010-04-26T18:31:24Z

Created page with 'Is there a good reason for this to be a category and not a page? -- ~~~~'

New page

Is there a good reason for this to be a category and not a page? -- [[User:Gonzoron|Gonzoron]] 18:31, 26 April 2010 (UTC)