Talk:Yako Vormoff - Revision history

Gonzoron: typo correction. -- late night wikiing

2010-03-03T15:11:41Z

typo correction. -- late night wikiing

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:11, 3 March 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The category chain for the individual NPC's should include or exclude parts that fit for general classification purposes of the monster species but not for specifying the individuals? To be exact, does Lich stay or go? Yes Vassaliches are a subcategory of Liches, Liches in training if one likes, but no Yako is not yet a Lich and may never become one.[[User:Cure\|Cure]] 03:33, 23 February 2010 (UTC)		The category chain for the individual NPC's should include or exclude parts that fit for general classification purposes of the monster species but not for specifying the individuals? To be exact, does Lich stay or go? Yes Vassaliches are a subcategory of Liches, Liches in training if one likes, but no Yako is not yet a Lich and may never become one.[[User:Cure\|Cure]] 03:33, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

	I say lich stays. Vassalich is a weird case because it's kind of a type of lich, but not exactly. But I don't think we should make it a special case. Give him all categories up to undead, including ~~witch~~. -- [[User:Gonzoron\|Gonzoron]] 03:29, 1 March 2010 (UTC)		I say lich stays. Vassalich is a weird case because it's kind of a type of lich, but not exactly. But I don't think we should make it a special case. Give him all categories up to undead, including lich. -- [[User:Gonzoron\|Gonzoron]] 03:29, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Gonzoron at 03:29, 1 March 2010

2010-03-01T03:29:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:29, 28 February 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The category chain for the individual NPC's should include or exclude parts that fit for general classification purposes of the monster species but not for specifying the individuals? To be exact, does Lich stay or go? Yes Vassaliches are a subcategory of Liches, Liches in training if one likes, but no Yako is not yet a Lich and may never become one.[[User:Cure\|Cure]] 03:33, 23 February 2010 (UTC)		The category chain for the individual NPC's should include or exclude parts that fit for general classification purposes of the monster species but not for specifying the individuals? To be exact, does Lich stay or go? Yes Vassaliches are a subcategory of Liches, Liches in training if one likes, but no Yako is not yet a Lich and may never become one.[[User:Cure\|Cure]] 03:33, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

			I say lich stays. Vassalich is a weird case because it's kind of a type of lich, but not exactly. But I don't think we should make it a special case. Give him all categories up to undead, including witch. -- [[User:Gonzoron\|Gonzoron]] 03:29, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Cure: Created page with 'The category chain for the individual NPC's should include or exclude parts that fit for general classification purposes of the monster species but not for specifying the individ…'

2010-02-23T03:33:17Z

Created page with 'The category chain for the individual NPC's should include or exclude parts that fit for general classification purposes of the monster species but not for specifying the individ…'

New page

The category chain for the individual NPC's should include or exclude parts that fit for general classification purposes of the monster species but not for specifying the individuals? To be exact, does Lich stay or go? Yes Vassaliches are a subcategory of Liches, Liches in training if one likes, but no Yako is not yet a Lich and may never become one.[[User:Cure|Cure]] 03:33, 23 February 2010 (UTC)