Category talk:The Twisting: Difference between revisions
Created page with 'Is there a good reason for this to be a category and not a page? -- ~~~~' |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Is there a good reason for this to be a category and not a page? -- [[User:Gonzoron|Gonzoron]] 18:31, 26 April 2010 (UTC) | Is there a good reason for this to be a category and not a page? -- [[User:Gonzoron|Gonzoron]] 18:31, 26 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
There was when [[Freak]] was included within it. But Deepshadow observed that that broke containment rules, which I am struggling to come to terms with, although I did move Freaks out of the category. | |||
Take a look at [[Demonology]]. I suspect that it does not respect rules of containment and I believe that it is perfectly good as it currently exists. Or am I missing something? And if it is fine, shouldn't [[Freak]] be within the [[:Category:The Twisting]]? Insight sought . . .[[User:Cure|Cure]] 15:35, 27 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
Let's take the categorization questions to a central place to work them out: [[Mistipedia_Talk:Categorization_Guidelines]] -- [[User:Gonzoron|Gonzoron]] 14:59, 24 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 09:12, 24 May 2010
Is there a good reason for this to be a category and not a page? -- Gonzoron 18:31, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
There was when Freak was included within it. But Deepshadow observed that that broke containment rules, which I am struggling to come to terms with, although I did move Freaks out of the category.
Take a look at Demonology. I suspect that it does not respect rules of containment and I believe that it is perfectly good as it currently exists. Or am I missing something? And if it is fine, shouldn't Freak be within the Category:The Twisting? Insight sought . . .Cure 15:35, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
Let's take the categorization questions to a central place to work them out: Mistipedia_Talk:Categorization_Guidelines -- Gonzoron 14:59, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
