Herr Gimpfel: Difference between revisions

From Mistipedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{canon}}
{{canon}}


Many decades ago, Herr Gimpfel was a [[Darkonian]] [[burgher]] and the (former) [[employer]] of [[Hilda Von Karlsveld]]<ref>[[Mordenheim (Novel)]] p.13</ref> and [[Friedrich Kreutzer]]. Herr Gimpfel was a prim and proper type (otherwise described as a 'sanctimonious sheepshank' by [[Herman von Schreck]]), who did not approve of his [[servant]]s romancing each other<ref>[[Mordenheim (Novel)]] p.16</ref>, much the less consorting with the [[necromancer]] [[Herman Von Schreck]]. Herr Gimpfel fired his [[employee]]s for the latter [[transgression]].<ref>[[Mordenheim (Novel)]] p.20-21</ref>
Many decades ago, Herr Gimpfel was a [[Darkonian]] [[burgher]] and the (former) [[employer]] of [[Hilda Von Karlsveld]]<ref>[[Mordenheim (Novel)]] p.13</ref> and [[Friedrich Kreutzer]]. Herr Gimpfel was a prim and proper type (otherwise described as a 'sanctimonious sheepshank' by [[Herman Von Schreck]]), who did not approve of his [[servant]]s romancing each other<ref>[[Mordenheim (Novel)]] p.16</ref>, much the less consorting with the [[necromancer]] [[Herman Von Schreck]]. Herr Gimpfel fired his [[employee]]s for the latter [[transgression]].<ref>[[Mordenheim (Novel)]] p.20-21</ref>


{{Spec|Given the time he lived, he is probably [[deceased]] in the current timeline.}}
{{Spec|Given the time he lived, he is probably [[deceased]] in the current timeline.}}

Latest revision as of 07:34, 9 December 2022

Many decades ago, Herr Gimpfel was a Darkonian burgher and the (former) employer of Hilda Von Karlsveld[1] and Friedrich Kreutzer. Herr Gimpfel was a prim and proper type (otherwise described as a 'sanctimonious sheepshank' by Herman Von Schreck), who did not approve of his servants romancing each other[2], much the less consorting with the necromancer Herman Von Schreck. Herr Gimpfel fired his employees for the latter transgression.[3] Given the time he lived, he is probably deceased in the current timeline.

References