Talk:Yako Vormoff: Difference between revisions
From Mistipedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Created page with 'The category chain for the individual NPC's should include or exclude parts that fit for general classification purposes of the monster species but not for specifying the individ…' |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The category chain for the individual NPC's should include or exclude parts that fit for general classification purposes of the monster species but not for specifying the individuals? To be exact, does Lich stay or go? Yes Vassaliches are a subcategory of Liches, Liches in training if one likes, but no Yako is not yet a Lich and may never become one.[[User:Cure|Cure]] 03:33, 23 February 2010 (UTC) | The category chain for the individual NPC's should include or exclude parts that fit for general classification purposes of the monster species but not for specifying the individuals? To be exact, does Lich stay or go? Yes Vassaliches are a subcategory of Liches, Liches in training if one likes, but no Yako is not yet a Lich and may never become one.[[User:Cure|Cure]] 03:33, 23 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
I say lich stays. Vassalich is a weird case because it's kind of a type of lich, but not exactly. But I don't think we should make it a special case. Give him all categories up to undead, including witch. -- [[User:Gonzoron|Gonzoron]] 03:29, 1 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:29, 28 February 2010
The category chain for the individual NPC's should include or exclude parts that fit for general classification purposes of the monster species but not for specifying the individuals? To be exact, does Lich stay or go? Yes Vassaliches are a subcategory of Liches, Liches in training if one likes, but no Yako is not yet a Lich and may never become one.Cure 03:33, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
I say lich stays. Vassalich is a weird case because it's kind of a type of lich, but not exactly. But I don't think we should make it a special case. Give him all categories up to undead, including witch. -- Gonzoron 03:29, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
