Talk:Angel Pajaro: Difference between revisions
DeepShadow (talk | contribs) Created page with 'Insofar as all werefoxes are lycanthropes and shapechangers, can't these be removed from the categories of Angel and Karino? ~~~~' |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Insofar as all werefoxes are lycanthropes and shapechangers, can't these be removed from the categories of Angel and Karino? [[User:DeepShadow|DeepShadow]] 00:46, 8 April 2010 (UTC) | Insofar as all werefoxes are lycanthropes and shapechangers, can't these be removed from the categories of Angel and Karino? [[User:DeepShadow|DeepShadow]] 00:46, 8 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
The proposal I put forth under [[Talk:Elsepeth]] was that NPCs should have all categories up to their "Van Richten Category". Unless someone has a counter-proposal, I'm happy with keeping lycanthrope. That way, if anyone wants a list of Lycanthrope NPC's, it's right there on the [[:Category:Lycanthrope]] page. Shapechanger doesn't fit the proposal, so I say remove it. Unless someone thinks a list of Shapechanger NPC's is useful, in which case we need to change the guidelines. Personally, I think that's a bit too broad of a category to be useful but I'm willing to be convinced. (Obviously, burying guidelines on a random NPC's talk page is not the best way to publicize them. Eventually, I'll move them to a help page of some sort where we can discuss and refine them.) -- [[User:Gonzoron|Gonzoron]] 03:10, 8 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:10, 7 April 2010
Insofar as all werefoxes are lycanthropes and shapechangers, can't these be removed from the categories of Angel and Karino? DeepShadow 00:46, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
The proposal I put forth under Talk:Elsepeth was that NPCs should have all categories up to their "Van Richten Category". Unless someone has a counter-proposal, I'm happy with keeping lycanthrope. That way, if anyone wants a list of Lycanthrope NPC's, it's right there on the Category:Lycanthrope page. Shapechanger doesn't fit the proposal, so I say remove it. Unless someone thinks a list of Shapechanger NPC's is useful, in which case we need to change the guidelines. Personally, I think that's a bit too broad of a category to be useful but I'm willing to be convinced. (Obviously, burying guidelines on a random NPC's talk page is not the best way to publicize them. Eventually, I'll move them to a help page of some sort where we can discuss and refine them.) -- Gonzoron 03:10, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
