Talk:Zhakata the Destroyer: Difference between revisions
From Mistipedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
DeepShadow (talk | contribs) Created page with 'I don't see why se should go out of our way to add "the destroyer" to a deity that has a provider aspect. Canon states that the Provider that is worshipped by Heretics; are we s…' |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I don't see why se should go out of our way to add "the destroyer" to a deity that has a provider aspect. Canon states that the Provider that is worshipped by Heretics; are we supposed to create a separate entry? [[User:DeepShadow|DeepShadow]] 01:07, 31 January 2010 (UTC) | I don't see why se should go out of our way to add "the destroyer" to a deity that has a provider aspect. Canon states that the Provider that is worshipped by Heretics; are we supposed to create a separate entry? [[User:DeepShadow|DeepShadow]] 01:07, 31 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
Good point. I was simply following along with convention of going with most authorative titles, but in this case it mucks things up. [[User:Cure|Cure]] | |||
Latest revision as of 21:23, 30 January 2010
I don't see why se should go out of our way to add "the destroyer" to a deity that has a provider aspect. Canon states that the Provider that is worshipped by Heretics; are we supposed to create a separate entry? DeepShadow 01:07, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
Good point. I was simply following along with convention of going with most authorative titles, but in this case it mucks things up. Cure
