Category talk:Osiris: Difference between revisions
Created page with 'Seriously, does everyone and everything need to be a category? I really don't think so... -- ~~~~' |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Seriously, does everyone and everything need to be a category? I really don't think so... -- [[User:Gonzoron|Gonzoron]] 04:11, 13 February 2010 (UTC) | Seriously, does everyone and everything need to be a category? I really don't think so... -- [[User:Gonzoron|Gonzoron]] 04:11, 13 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
It was an experiment with a small domain. The idea being that in the finished result anything interconnected would automagically show up with those connections manifest. For exemple, the mummifying strips with Osiris. The result for the domain page I think is actually very good. Sitting down to write out a description of the domain, breaking it up into revelent categories, would be very simple. As for the rest, it is probably not worth the work. I could imagine a darklord like Strahd would be very usefully rendered as a catagory, since there is some much out there connected to him. But it does become pointless with one shot NPC's or one reference places, etc. Some thought should perhaps be given to the best approach, or approaches, to the matter.[[User:Cure|Cure]] 09:20, 13 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:20, 13 February 2010
Seriously, does everyone and everything need to be a category? I really don't think so... -- Gonzoron 04:11, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
It was an experiment with a small domain. The idea being that in the finished result anything interconnected would automagically show up with those connections manifest. For exemple, the mummifying strips with Osiris. The result for the domain page I think is actually very good. Sitting down to write out a description of the domain, breaking it up into revelent categories, would be very simple. As for the rest, it is probably not worth the work. I could imagine a darklord like Strahd would be very usefully rendered as a catagory, since there is some much out there connected to him. But it does become pointless with one shot NPC's or one reference places, etc. Some thought should perhaps be given to the best approach, or approaches, to the matter.Cure 09:20, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
