Category talk:Vorlog: Difference between revisions
From Mistipedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Created page with 'Aaaaaaand... we've hit a snag. The vorlog template can be applied to humanoids OR monstrous humanoids, and doesn't change the type. So what category does Vorlog go into? -- ~…' |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Aaaaaaand... we've hit a snag. The vorlog template can be applied to humanoids OR monstrous humanoids, and doesn't change the type. So what category does Vorlog go into? -- [[User:Gonzoron|Gonzoron]] 16:07, 17 February 2010 (UTC) | Aaaaaaand... we've hit a snag. The vorlog template can be applied to humanoids OR monstrous humanoids, and doesn't change the type. So what category does Vorlog go into? -- [[User:Gonzoron|Gonzoron]] 16:07, 17 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
Same is true of lycanthropes, by the way, (humanoid or giant) but at least they had category:shapechanger in "category:Other monster groupings" to tie them into category:monster. Do we need a "category:Cross-type template" or something like that in "category:Other monster groupings"? Ugh... -- [[User:Gonzoron|Gonzoron]] 16:49, 17 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 10:49, 17 February 2010
Aaaaaaand... we've hit a snag. The vorlog template can be applied to humanoids OR monstrous humanoids, and doesn't change the type. So what category does Vorlog go into? -- Gonzoron 16:07, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
Same is true of lycanthropes, by the way, (humanoid or giant) but at least they had category:shapechanger in "category:Other monster groupings" to tie them into category:monster. Do we need a "category:Cross-type template" or something like that in "category:Other monster groupings"? Ugh... -- Gonzoron 16:49, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
