Category talk:Outcast Reaver: Difference between revisions
From Mistipedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Not sure I see what criteria makes these different than any other creature type. Why shouldn't they go all the way up to the top level? -- [[User:Gonzoron|Gonzoron]] 04:13, 18 February 2010 (UTC) | Not sure I see what criteria makes these different than any other creature type. Why shouldn't they go all the way up to the top level? -- [[User:Gonzoron|Gonzoron]] 04:13, 18 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
Sticking with geists for a moment and the previously discussed idea of Van Ritchen categories, geists are a subset of ghosts, so won't also appear under undead? Or have I misunderstood? | Sticking with geists for a moment and the previously discussed idea of Van Ritchen categories, geists are a subset of ghosts, so won't also appear under undead? Or have I misunderstood?[[User:Cure|Cure]] 05:44, 18 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 23:44, 17 February 2010
Should the Outcast Reaver only occur under Reaver and Aquatic? Same with Geist in relation to Ghost? And generally of course?Cure 01:16, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
Not sure I see what criteria makes these different than any other creature type. Why shouldn't they go all the way up to the top level? -- Gonzoron 04:13, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
Sticking with geists for a moment and the previously discussed idea of Van Ritchen categories, geists are a subset of ghosts, so won't also appear under undead? Or have I misunderstood?Cure 05:44, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
