Category talk:Guardian Portrait: Difference between revisions

From Mistipedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Cure (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Cure (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
Line 5: Line 5:
Don't forget the speculation boilerplate specified on [[:Category:Unsorted Monsters]] if you are doing any categorizing, please. -- [[User:Gonzoron|Gonzoron]] 14:51, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
Don't forget the speculation boilerplate specified on [[:Category:Unsorted Monsters]] if you are doing any categorizing, please. -- [[User:Gonzoron|Gonzoron]] 14:51, 8 March 2010 (UTC)


I had the insight that Expedition to Castle Ravenloft could actually be useful, so I looked up the same room in it hoping to find a description in 3.5 ed terms and thus a type. But of course they skipped the item. Grrrr.19:10, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
I had the insight that Expedition to Castle Ravenloft could actually be useful, so I looked up the same room in it hoping to find a description in 3.5 ed terms and thus a type. But of course they skipped the item. Grrrr.[[User:Cure|Cure]] 19:50, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 13:50, 8 March 2010

Construct?Cure 06:30, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Can't tell without consulting boxed-up sources, but I would say yes. It's a painting, it's a monster. Sounds like a construct. -- Gonzoron 14:36, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Don't forget the speculation boilerplate specified on Category:Unsorted Monsters if you are doing any categorizing, please. -- Gonzoron 14:51, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

I had the insight that Expedition to Castle Ravenloft could actually be useful, so I looked up the same room in it hoping to find a description in 3.5 ed terms and thus a type. But of course they skipped the item. Grrrr.Cure 19:50, 8 March 2010 (UTC)