Category talk:Religion: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Not sure what you mean by "redundant entries." Do you mean that each religion should be only a religion and not a society? I think it's fine to leave both tags. Don't worry too much about the next catalogue import. Things have evolved so much since I wrote the script that it will be a major overhaul to make things work anyway, so do what's right for the wiki and I'll work out the importing later. | Not sure what you mean by "redundant entries." Do you mean that each religion should be only a religion and not a society? I think it's fine to leave both tags. Don't worry too much about the next catalogue import. Things have evolved so much since I wrote the script that it will be a major overhaul to make things work anyway, so do what's right for the wiki and I'll work out the importing later. | ||
The batch page-to- | The batch page-to-category conversion is not as automatic as I make it sound. There's a lot of manual effort to do it. The more pages done at once, the more economy of scale makes it easy. For 11 pages, I think it's easier just to do them individually via wiki interface. -- [[User:Gonzoron|Gonzoron]] 19:50, 17 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 13:50, 17 March 2010
So I've made this a subcategory of Society, but removing the redundant entries in all the religions would intrude on the Catalogue entry. Hopefully it will get fixed at the next go round?
---
Could the remaining religions that are not categories be converted to categories as a batch operation?Cure 16:23, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
Not sure what you mean by "redundant entries." Do you mean that each religion should be only a religion and not a society? I think it's fine to leave both tags. Don't worry too much about the next catalogue import. Things have evolved so much since I wrote the script that it will be a major overhaul to make things work anyway, so do what's right for the wiki and I'll work out the importing later.
The batch page-to-category conversion is not as automatic as I make it sound. There's a lot of manual effort to do it. The more pages done at once, the more economy of scale makes it easy. For 11 pages, I think it's easier just to do them individually via wiki interface. -- Gonzoron 19:50, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
