Category talk:Plant: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
This might also apply to trade goods (domains' primary imports/exports). And some of this overlaps with work Cure has been doing. Just stuff to consider. --[[User:ChrisNichols|ChrisNichols]] 20:45, 22 April 2010 (UTC) | This might also apply to trade goods (domains' primary imports/exports). And some of this overlaps with work Cure has been doing. Just stuff to consider. --[[User:ChrisNichols|ChrisNichols]] 20:45, 22 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
Ultimately, yes. Ranges would be extremely useful. I would love a complete treatment of trading relations. And with them of river traffic. Is it the first thing that should get done? Many would probabaly say no. BUt it is up to you really and what | Ultimately, yes. Ranges would be extremely useful. I would love a complete treatment of trading relations. And with them of river traffic. Is it the first thing that should get done? Many would probabaly say no. BUt it is up to you really and what interests you. I still need to go back and finish up such things for Nova Vaasa, but I have grown board of it for the moment.[[User:Cure|Cure]] 00:18, 23 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 18:18, 22 April 2010
Should we make pages for species of mundane plants, like trees? In Gaz. 1, the section on Barovian flora lists beech, oak, cherry, hazelnut, spruce, fir, pine, wild lilac, and daffodil as normal plants native to Barovia. Should any of these have a page (presumably noting their native range in the Demiplane)? Personally, I'd say not until we've added a lot more of the more unique people/places/things to the wiki; instead, this would be something to consider in the future (several months or more down the road).
The same question goes for fauna, such as those mentioned in Barovia's fauna section - deer, elk, boar, chamois, lynx, otter, badger, weasel, fox, wolf, rat, raven, owl, hawk, snake, eagle, and bear.
This might also apply to trade goods (domains' primary imports/exports). And some of this overlaps with work Cure has been doing. Just stuff to consider. --ChrisNichols 20:45, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
Ultimately, yes. Ranges would be extremely useful. I would love a complete treatment of trading relations. And with them of river traffic. Is it the first thing that should get done? Many would probabaly say no. BUt it is up to you really and what interests you. I still need to go back and finish up such things for Nova Vaasa, but I have grown board of it for the moment.Cure 00:18, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
