Category talk:The Twisting: Difference between revisions
From Mistipedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
There was when [[Freak]] was included within it. But Deepshadow observed that that broke containment rules, which I am struggling to come to terms with, although I did move Freaks out of the category. | There was when [[Freak]] was included within it. But Deepshadow observed that that broke containment rules, which I am struggling to come to terms with, although I did move Freaks out of the category. | ||
Take a look at [[Demonology]]. I suspect that it does not respect rules of containment and I believe that it is perfectly good as it currently exists. Or am I missing something? And if it is fine, shouldn't [[Freak]] be within the [[:Category:Twisting]]? Insight sought . . .[[User:Cure|Cure]] 15: | Take a look at [[Demonology]]. I suspect that it does not respect rules of containment and I believe that it is perfectly good as it currently exists. Or am I missing something? And if it is fine, shouldn't [[Freak]] be within the [[:Category:The Twisting]]? Insight sought . . .[[User:Cure|Cure]] 15:35, 27 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 09:35, 27 April 2010
Is there a good reason for this to be a category and not a page? -- Gonzoron 18:31, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
There was when Freak was included within it. But Deepshadow observed that that broke containment rules, which I am struggling to come to terms with, although I did move Freaks out of the category.
Take a look at Demonology. I suspect that it does not respect rules of containment and I believe that it is perfectly good as it currently exists. Or am I missing something? And if it is fine, shouldn't Freak be within the Category:The Twisting? Insight sought . . .Cure 15:35, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
