Category talk:Aristocrat: Difference between revisions
From Mistipedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
:So my preference is: Aristocrat is a disambig, which leads to [[:Category:Aristocrat]] for the class and [[:Category:Noble]] for the title. -- [[User:Gonzoron|Gonzoron]] 15:02, 28 April 2010 (UTC) | :So my preference is: Aristocrat is a disambig, which leads to [[:Category:Aristocrat]] for the class and [[:Category:Noble]] for the title. -- [[User:Gonzoron|Gonzoron]] 15:02, 28 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
::Perfect.[[User:Cure|Cure]] 16:07, 28 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 10:07, 28 April 2010
Any thoughts on how to sort out aristocrat vs. noble vs. aristocrat the class, vs. landowner.
Aristocrat the class can be done as Category:Aristocrat (Class)).
Would all aristocrats and all nobles be landowners, but not all landsowners aristocrats or nobles?
And would noble and aristocrat be synomous?Cure 05:35, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
- I say noble and aristocrat are synonymous, based on my gut feeling, and bolstered by some online dictionary searching.
- Nothing in the definition of either requires land ownership, though. I think it best to leave them separate. Ravenloft is not completely feudal, so non-noble landowners surely exist. But it's also possible for a noble to lose their lands, I'd imagine. Or for a young noble to not yet be given lands.
- So my preference is: Aristocrat is a disambig, which leads to Category:Aristocrat for the class and Category:Noble for the title. -- Gonzoron 15:02, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
- Perfect.Cure 16:07, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
