Science: Difference between revisions

From Mistipedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Cure (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Cure (talk | contribs)
Redirected page to Category:Science
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Homebrew}}
#REDIRECT[[:Category:Science]]
 
Science began as [[reflection]] that deemed the habit of ascribing the unknown workings of the stuff of existence and of existence itself to the [[gods]] as lacking sufficient curiousity and rigor. It grew into a boundlessly curious and largely rigorous exploration not only of nature but also of the nature of nature. Tremendous advances in [[mathematics]] and most especially in [[mechanics]], combined with the explosion into open conflict of the struggle between science and [[religion]] over the [[authority]] to define the nature of nature, triggered a revolution in science. Science became material science, the science of things and of the mechanical, mathematically bound universe in which they were purported to exist. Science became the study of the great machine of existence. [[Philosophy]], previously the ultimate form of scientific endeavour, was cast out of science as groundless speculation at best and as obscurantist superstition at worst. And it was as obscurantist superstition that religion and the [[deity | gods]] were dismissed and consigned to the dustbin of [[history]].
 
In the [[Land of Mists]] only the people of [[Lamordia]], and by no means every last one of them, conceive of science in its modern form, which is to say as material science. [[Victor Mordenheim]] is in fact the arch-priest of modern science, although he doesn't spend much of his time evangelising. In other modern lands material science may certainly have a foothold in the [[university | universities]] and especially among those working in [[mathematics]] and [[mechanics]]. Its methods are very conceivably gaining ground in [[biology]] and in [[alchemy]], threatening the division of the latter into [[alchemy]] and [[chemistry]]. There is likewise also the potential for a split within [[psychology]]. The burgeoning science of [[economy]] would certainly see much that is admirable in the new science and at least some [[historian|historians]] and [[linguist|linguists]] may be beginning to wonder about its applicability to their disciplines. Those in [[arcane lore|arcane studies]] would regard it, at best, as a wayward child and, at worst, as a slanderous and unconscionable attack upon the legitimacy of their own field of research and endeavour. New science would be universally abhored by those in [[theology|theological studies]] and by the [[religion|religions]] as a false [[deity | god]]. Outside of the most modern domains, however, science in any form would have but a  tenuous hold on the popular imagination, with modern science being the least understood of all.
 
[[Category:Reflection]][[Category:Knowledge]]

Latest revision as of 00:02, 22 December 2010

Redirect to: