Category talk:The Twisting

Is there a good reason for this to be a category and not a page? -- Gonzoron 18:31, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

There was when Freak was included within it. But Deepshadow observed that that broke containment rules, which I am struggling to come to terms with, although I did move Freaks out of the category.

Take a look at Demonology. I suspect that it does not respect rules of containment and I believe that it is perfectly good as it currently exists. Or am I missing something? And if it is fine, shouldn't Freak be within the Category:Twisting? Insight sought . . .Cure 15:34, 27 April 2010 (UTC)